AI kill switch: Who gets to pull the plug if AI becomes too dangerous?

6 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Sep 16, 2026 08:45 AM IST

As warnings about the risks of advanced AI grow louder, experts and industry leaders are divided over how the technology should be regulated, monitored and, if necessary, shut down. (Express Image/Magnific)

Earlier this week, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei wrote a lengthy essay about the dire need to slow down the progress of frontier artificial intelligence (AI). His view was backed by rivals like OpenAI’s Sam Altman and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, all three of whom have been involved in public disagreements in the past. Considering the influence these frontier AI companies wield on the broader industry, the bigger question is: is there a kill switch for AI? And can these companies actually exercise that if the situation calls for it?

In a recent interview with the BBC, Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark said that an AI kill switch may need to be mandatory for companies developing the technology at the frontier. Clark believes that a way of shutting off AI systems completely if they get too dangerous is something society may want to eventually pass rules around.

Clark explained that most AI labs have different ways of pulling the plug on their AI systems. However, he is of the opinion that lawmakers would need to make such safeguards mandatory. The fears around AI’s rapid development and the risks it poses to humanity have been in the spotlight for the past few days after a spate of warnings from executives from AI companies. When it comes to the kill switch, Clark told the BBC that the specifics around the kill switch, such as the technical requirements and how it would be verified and enforced, should be part of the larger policy debate around AI.

Transparency over self-policing

Story continues below this ad

Story continues below this ad

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

• Anthropic
• artificial intelligence