SyncAI.news, a Varaisys broadcasting
Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answers
HK

Hita Kambhamettu, Alyssa Hwang, Philippe Laban, Andrew Head

· 1 min read

ResearcharXiv cs.AI

Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answers

arXiv:2510.00361v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI answer engines are a relatively new kind of information search tool: rather than returning a ranked list of documents, they generate an answer to a search question with inline citations to sources. But reading the cited sources is costly, and citation links themselves offer little guidance about what evidence they contain. We present attribution gradients, a technique to boost the informativeness of citations by consolidating scent and information prey in place. Its first feature is bringing evidence counts, supporting/contradictory excerpts, links to sources, and contextual explanations into one place. Its second feature is the ability to unravel second-degree citations in place. In a lab study, we demonstrate usage of the full gradient in a critical reading task and its support for deep engagement that increased the depth of what readers took away from the sources versus a standard citation and document QA design.

Original source

This story was published by arXiv cs.AI and written by Hita Kambhamettu, Alyssa Hwang, Philippe Laban, Andrew Head. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.

Read the full story on arxiv.org

Similar News