SyncAI.news, a Varaisys broadcasting
Beyond Solo and Consistency: Vindicating Multi-Agent Debate via Conditional Progressive Pruning
RY

Ruosong Ye, Caiqi Zhang, Jiahao Li, Haijun Wu, Xiaolong Luo, Huiyuan Chen, Yu Wang, Ying Chen, Zhenting Wang, Kai Mei, Yang Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas

· 1 min read

ResearcharXiv cs.CL

Beyond Solo and Consistency: Vindicating Multi-Agent Debate via Conditional Progressive Pruning

arXiv:2609.33974v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) based Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is one of the most effective test time scaling techniques. Through multi-round communication, agents complement each other in knowledge and reasoning and solve tasks that no single member can solve. However, existing MAD frameworks fail to beat strong Single Agent and Consistency-based baselines under the same strict cost limit, which shakes the foundation of the MAD field. We propose Conditional Progressive Pruning (CPP), a lightweight pruning framework that fully exploits multi-round MAD. CPP outperforms all existing MAD frameworks on multiple dominated benchmarks. It is also the first to fully outperform consistency methods. Our code, detailed agent interaction records will be released soon.

Original source

This story was published by arXiv cs.CL and written by Ruosong Ye, Caiqi Zhang, Jiahao Li, Haijun Wu, Xiaolong Luo, Huiyuan Chen, Yu Wang, Ying Chen, Zhenting Wang, Kai Mei, Yang Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.

Read the full story on arxiv.org

Similar News