SyncAI.news, a Varaisys broadcasting
EndoSCOP-V: A Multi-Turn Video Understanding Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Models in Endoscopy Reporting and Clinical Reasoning
AT

Abhishek Tyagi, Tanmay Jain, Vilas Biradar, Krithi Krishna Koduri, Misba Hul Bashir Masoodi, Swetha Rapolu, Hardik Rughwani, Rachana Kotha, Anjan Kumar Kaipa, Anudeep Katrevula, Rakesh Garlapati, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Rajendra Patel, Abhay Tyagi, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mohan Ramchandani, Rakesh Kalapala, D. Nageshwar Reddy

· 1 min read

ResearcharXiv cs.CV

EndoSCOP-V: A Multi-Turn Video Understanding Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Models in Endoscopy Reporting and Clinical Reasoning

arXiv:2611.10626v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Endoscopic diagnosis unfolds over native video, where a single positive finding during traversal of the gastrointestinal tract sets off a multi-minute chain of reasoning over location, morphology, severity and intervention. Existing endoscopy multimodal benchmarks test only static images or single-disease videos, which miss the temporal and clinical reasoning that real-world reporting demands. We introduce EndoSCOP-V, a video-grounded multi-turn evaluation framework for structured endoscopy reporting and clinical reasoning. It contains 1,307 real-world endoscopy and colonoscopy videos (63.2 h; 97% 1080p) averaging about 174 s. Its 20,274 question-answer turns are instantiated deterministically from clinician-filled structured endoscopy-reporting EHRs, so no per-case annotation is synthetic or LLM-rephrased. They come from 1,033 clinician-reviewed templates, about 18 per disease, that span a clinically aligned 9-task x 30-sub-task reporting taxonomy over 54 World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) MST 3.0 diseases. 22% of procedures carry co-existing pathologies, up to six per case. A Markovian context-pruned oracle-forcing protocol evaluates the dialogue turn by turn, injecting the gold answer before each subsequent turn so that per-turn reasoning is isolated from cascading dialogue errors. A panel of 15 board-certified endoscopists sets a 78% strict-accuracy baseline on 1,500 questions. Across 14 open-weight LMMs, the best 27B-class model reaches 59.8% strict accuracy, falling to 53.4% once format-trivial disease-rejection items are excluded. On a between-subjects spot-check, the best of 3 frontier proprietary models trails the clinician panel by 23 pp on strict NDR accuracy. Sub-task analysis reveals consistent gaps in quantitative measurement, multi-variable grading and intervention reasoning on long-horizon video. Data: Hugging Face (EndoSCOP-V). Code: GitHub (abhi25t/EndoSCOP-V).

Original source

This story was published by arXiv cs.CV and written by Abhishek Tyagi, Tanmay Jain, Vilas Biradar, Krithi Krishna Koduri, Misba Hul Bashir Masoodi, Swetha Rapolu, Hardik Rughwani, Rachana Kotha, Anjan Kumar Kaipa, Anudeep Katrevula, Rakesh Garlapati, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Rajendra Patel, Abhay Tyagi, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mohan Ramchandani, Rakesh Kalapala, D. Nageshwar Reddy. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.

Read the full story on arxiv.org

Similar News