SyncAI.news, a Varaisys broadcasting
From Fluent Text to Ontology-Compatible Definitions: A Quality-Control Agentic Workflow
KF

Kun Feng, Chenchen Chu, Yan Liu, Haojie Sun, Jijun Tang, Chen Tian, Shuolin Xiao, Jianping He, Zhao Li

· 1 min read

ResearcharXiv cs.AI

From Fluent Text to Ontology-Compatible Definitions: A Quality-Control Agentic Workflow

arXiv:2611.12095v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Biomedical ontologies are structured knowledge systems that must evolve continuously to represent newly emerging knowledge, but their manual maintenance remains time-consuming and laborintensive. Textual definitions are especially costly because they must be readable to humans and compatible with controlled entities, relations, and logical constraints. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising way to assist ontology engineering tasks, including definition generation. However, textual plausibility does not guarantee knowledge-system compatibility. A generated definition may be fluent and close to a reference definition, yet still fail to ground its implied entities or violate ontology-level constraints. Directly inserting such definitions into ontology libraries may therefore introduce entity-level hallucinations and logical inconsistencies. To address this problem, we propose two structured-knowledge incompatibility metrics, Entity Error Rate (EER) and Logical Inconsistency Rate (LIR), to quantify entity grounding and logical consistency for LLM-generated ontology definitions. We further develop an agentic quality-control (QC) workflow that treats definition generation as an iterative process rather than a direct decoding step: it generates definitions, extracts axioms, checks entity existence and logical consistency, and uses the resulting diagnostics to drive repair loops. Comprehensive experiments on Disease Ontology, Uberon Ontology, and Uberon-ConstraintStress demonstrate that EER and LIR complement conventional reference-based metrics by evaluating whether generated content can be grounded and checked inside the target ontology. The workflow effectively decreases EER while maintaining strong conventional text-generation performance. LIR further exposes sparse ontology-level logical failures that are invisible to text similarity metrics, although their repair remains limited.

Original source

This story was published by arXiv cs.AI and written by Kun Feng, Chenchen Chu, Yan Liu, Haojie Sun, Jijun Tang, Chen Tian, Shuolin Xiao, Jianping He, Zhao Li. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.

Read the full story on arxiv.org

Similar News