SyncAI.news, a Varaisys broadcasting
Kinematics-Grounded Agentic AI for Robotic Additive Manufacturing Process Planning
JG

Jingzhan Ge, Ruimin Chen, Azadeh Haghighi, Jiong Tang, Farhad Imani

· 1 min read

ResearcharXiv cs.AI

Kinematics-Grounded Agentic AI for Robotic Additive Manufacturing Process Planning

arXiv:2609.19347v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robotic additive manufacturing (AM) extends material-extrusion printing beyond gantry kinematics but makes process planning robot-dependent. A slicer-generated plan that appears favorable in part coordinates can become infeasible or robotically unfavorable on a manipulator because slicer-process decisions and part orientation determine the generated path, while part orientation and workspace placement affect its kinematic realization. Existing AM tools, large language model (LLM)-based decision-support methods, and digital-shadow systems do not provide integrated pre-execution evaluation of these coupled decisions. This paper presents agentic robotic additive manufacturing (A-RAM), an agent-specialist-tool framework that converts user intent and a part file into traceable, execution-ready plans. The LLM interprets manufacturing objectives and constraints, identifies prescribed and searchable planning variables, and encodes this reasoning in a schema-constrained request; a deterministic Planning Agent instantiates the corresponding search workflow, while domain tools compute quantitative evidence for slicing, placement, inverse kinematics, trajectory timing, Joint-6 jerk, and extrusion. The framework is evaluated on a six-axis robotic-arm AM cell through three case studies covering expert-specified planning, goal-only planning, objective-dependent infill screening, and geometry-dependent orientation-placement selection. Across the evaluated candidate sets, selected plans achieve up to 53.5% lower maximum Joint-6 jerk and 48.3% lower mean absolute Joint-6 jerk than the least favorable valid candidates, while objective-specific infill screening yields motion-plan completion times up to 40.1% shorter and extrusion paths up to 12.7% shorter than the corresponding least favorable screened patterns.

Original source

This story was published by arXiv cs.AI and written by Jingzhan Ge, Ruimin Chen, Azadeh Haghighi, Jiong Tang, Farhad Imani. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.

Read the full story on arxiv.org

Similar News