
HH
Hyojung Han
· 1 min read
ResearcharXiv cs.CL
On-Device Commercial Intent Retrieval Under Size, Latency, and Privacy Constraints: A 3 MiB Retrieval System with Typed Egress Boundaries
arXiv:2610.00170v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We study commercial intent inference that runs entirely on the user's device, under three constraints frozen before the work began: the downloaded payload under 3 MiB, Tier-0 inference under 20 ms at p95, and no raw text, content embedding, or stable identifier leaving the device. Under them we build a retrieval path over a 6,020-leaf commercial taxonomy: a static embedding table distilled from a Korean sentence transformer, quantized to 4 bits, no inference runtime.
Our main result is where that constraint costs accuracy. On real Korean commerce text labelled by others (22,900 AI-Hub shopping reviews), mid-category top-5 on real product names is 75.0% against an 18.4% permutation baseline, but splits on one observable: a query containing some leaf name as a substring scores 83.5%, one containing none 45.2%. A generic 196.6x larger teacher seemed to localize the gap (+20.1 pp without an anchor, +0.1 with). That null was two effects cancelling: the same teacher fine-tuned on the student's own contrastive pairs reaches 0.8586 and beats the pure-encoder student by +10.6 pp with an anchor and +20.9 pp without. The cost is not uniform, but it is not free anywhere; where the anchor is absent, task adaptation buys the teacher nothing, so what the constrained encoder lacks there is capacity. The expensive regime is detectable on-device from the ranker's own score margin: declining the least confident fifth lifts the rest to 0.8296.
A second axis we first reported, a manufacturer model code, does not survive source-category fixed effects (-4.0 pp, p=0.51); the anchor does (+13.0 pp).
Payload is 2,942,652 bytes, all three library links measured. Tier-0 p95 is 4.431 and 3.670 ms on two iPhones (A14, A16) and 5.080 ms on a budget Android tablet (Snapdragon 695), all slower than three server CPUs on the same code. Taxonomy supervision is mostly synthetic Korean utterances.
Original source
This story was published by arXiv cs.CL and written by Hyojung Han. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.
Read the full story on arxiv.org


