
CC
Christophe Cruz (ICB,UBE), Hussam Ghanem (ICB,UBE), Samir Jabbar (ICB,UBE), Ait Kbir (ICB,UBE), Hocine Cherifi (ICB,UBE)
· 1 min read
ResearcharXiv cs.AI
PARIS: A multi-agent LLM framework for end-to-end, PRISMA-guided systematic literature reviews with pre-synthesis corpus quality assessment
arXiv:2611.12222v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Systematic literature reviews (SRs) remain slow and labor-intensive, and most automation tools address single stages of the workflow. We present PARIS (PRISMA Agentic Research Intelligence System), an open-source framework in which a conductor agent running in Claude Code orchestrates 15 specialized large language model (LLM) agents, from scoping a research question to exporting a manuscript draft. Agents are specified declaratively, coordinate exclusively through persisted artifacts that the conductor validates before every transition, and delegate retrieval, bibliometric analysis and scoring to deterministic Python utilities. Three human checkpoints gate study inclusion, corpus adequacy and the synthesis outline. We also introduce QualityScore, a pre-synthesis index that aggregates normalized network, bibliometric, semantic and process sub-scores into a 0-100 grade. Two case studies illustrate both: AI chatbots and university students' learning (388 records, 100 included) and AI-assisted SR methods (131 records, 123 included, QualityScore 69.1 recomputed with a proxy network sub-score). They show end-to-end feasibility across domains and the diagnostic use of QualityScore: in the first run, corpus improvements chosen at the corpus-adequacy checkpoint raised the score from 74.6 to 81.9 and the number of pre-2023 studies from 1 to 19. Audits of both runs exposed failure modes: incomplete retrieval, counts that drifted between agents, unrecorded or delegated checkpoint decisions and a grade that depends on how citation data are handled. PARIS fully supports 8 of the 27 PRISMA 2020 items and partially supports 11. Output quality has so far been judged only by an internal reviewer agent; independent validation against human reviews is the next step.
Original source
This story was published by arXiv cs.AI and written by Christophe Cruz (ICB,UBE), Hussam Ghanem (ICB,UBE), Samir Jabbar (ICB,UBE), Ait Kbir (ICB,UBE), Hocine Cherifi (ICB,UBE). SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.
Read the full story on arxiv.org


