
LY
Lingsen You, Yujun Guo, Xinyu Zhong, Zijie Feng, Wentong Wang, Li Shen, Junbo Ge
· 1 min read
ResearcharXiv cs.AI
ScienceBuddy-PV: A Verifier-Governed Recursive Improvement Protocol for Panvascular Intervention Research
arXiv:2610.14523v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: ScienceBuddy-PV adapts the ScienceBuddy recursive-in-recursive design to panvascular intervention research through a structured evidence ledger, device-vessel ontology, abstention contract and retained failure bank. Recursive harness optimization and outer-loop model learning, including reinforcement learning, are specified but not executed. We audit a fixed component, rather than the complete agent system, using separate ARCADE syntax and stenosis tasks (1,000 training, 200 validation and 300 test images per task). A shared task-masked convolutional model was trained once per representation setting; its parameters and the heuristic support gate were then held fixed, with the stenosis threshold selected on validation data. On the locked test sets, syntax Dice was 0.475 (95% CI 0.459-0.490) and stenosis Dice was 0.231 (95% CI 0.214-0.249). Stenosis pixel AUROC was 0.957 and AUPRC was 0.180 at prevalence 0.00975. The gate accepted 76.7% of stenosis-frame outputs versus 100% for a score-only comparator. In a constructed mask audit, it accepted 44.3% of reference candidates and rejected 55.7%, exposing the cost of abstention. Acceptance does not establish correctness or clinical safety. This public-data component audit makes support and abstention measurable and provides a reproducible protocol for future collaborative agent studies. It does not demonstrate recursive improvement, patient-level validity or clinical device recommendations.
Original source
This story was published by arXiv cs.AI and written by Lingsen You, Yujun Guo, Xinyu Zhong, Zijie Feng, Wentong Wang, Li Shen, Junbo Ge. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.
Read the full story on arxiv.org


