SyncAI.news, a Varaisys broadcasting
Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds
MV

Marten van Dijk, Murat Bilgehan Ertan

· 1 min read

ResearcharXiv cs.LG

Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Allocation: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds

arXiv:2605.06259v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Within the $f$-DP framework, we derive a tight analysis of the trade-off function for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) with subsampling based on random allocation in which each sample is independently assigned to exactly one of $M$ minibatches per epoch, each minibatch corresponding to one of the $M$ SGD rounds within a single epoch. Our analysis holds under an explicit validity condition, whose hypotheses together force $\sigma \geq \sqrt{3/\ln M}$, where $\sigma$ is the DP noise multiplier. Unlike $f$-DP analyses for Poisson subsampling, which yield non-closed implicit formulas that can be machine computed but are non-transparent, random allocation admits a tight analysis yielding transparent and interpretable closed-form bounds. For a single epoch, our concrete bounds, derived via the Berry-Esseen theorem, are tight up to constant factors. We demonstrate worked parameter settings for a single epoch ($E=1$) with a corresponding trade-off function $\geq 1-a-\delta$, that is, only $\delta$ below the ideal random guessing diagonal $1-a$. For $\delta = 1/100$ and $\sigma = 1$, roughly $M \approx 1.14\times 10^6$ rounds and $N \approx 1.14\times 10^7$ training samples suffice to achieve meaningful differential privacy. This is in contrast to recent negative results for the regime $\sigma \leq 1/\sqrt{2 \ln M}$ for which no significant DP guarantee can exist.

Original source

This story was published by arXiv cs.LG and written by Marten van Dijk, Murat Bilgehan Ertan. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.

Read the full story on arxiv.org

Similar News