
XH
Xia Hu, Zhenrui Yue, Brian Potetz, Howard Zhou, Leonidas Guibas, Chun-Ta Lu, Zhicheng Wang
· 1 min read
ResearcharXiv cs.CV
The Cartesian Shortcut: Re-evaluate Vision Reasoning in Polar Coordinate Space
arXiv:2605.09883v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As current Multimodal Large Language Models rapidly saturate canonical visual reasoning benchmarks, a key question emerges: do these strong scores genuinely reflect robust visual understanding? We identify a pervasive vulnerability, the Cartesian Shortcut: models frequently discretize the orthogonal grid-based layouts prevalent in visual reasoning benchmarks into explicit textual coordinates, offloading reasoning from visual perception to text-based deduction. To re-evaluate visual reasoning when this shortcut is unavailable, we introduce Polaris-Bench, which re-formulates 53 visual reasoning tasks in Polar coordinate space with paired Cartesian counterparts that preserve task semantics, disrupting the orthogonal structure that models exploit. Comprehensive evaluation across $14$ state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals that frontier models achieving $69$--$83\%$ on Cartesian layouts collapse to $31$--$39\%$ on Polar equivalents. Moreover, thinking gains largely vanish on Polar layouts, prompting interventions fail to close the gap, and comparable drops arise on other non-orthogonal layouts. These findings reveal that current MLLMs' visual reasoning performance is strongly coupled to orthogonal grid structure, a fragility that is consistent across model families but far smaller in humans, who maintain 88.8\% accuracy on Polar layouts. The benchmark, evaluation suite, and leaderboard are publicly available at https://google-deepmind.github.io/polaris-bench.
Original source
This story was published by arXiv cs.CV and written by Xia Hu, Zhenrui Yue, Brian Potetz, Howard Zhou, Leonidas Guibas, Chun-Ta Lu, Zhicheng Wang. SyncAI.news shows a preview; the complete article is on the publisher's site.
Read the full story on arxiv.org


